Reference library · App Review

Guideline 5.2 Intellectual Property: brands, third-party content, and Apple's own trademarks

The legal rejection for content you don't own: another company's brand, a third-party service you're not cleared to use, media downloading, or Apple's own names and images.

Guideline 5.25. Legal · Intellectual PropertyApple text last updated June 8, 2026
Updated 7 min read

Checked against Apple's App Review Guidelines (last updated June 8, 2026), App Review help on complete submissions, Apple's App Store marketing and trademark guidelines, Apple's IP dispute forms, Apple's 2025 Transparency Report, and rejection messages posted on Apple Developer Forums, on Oct 9, 2026.

The short answer

Guideline 5.2 rejects apps that use material without permission: third-party trademarks or content (5.2.1), services whose terms don't allow your use (5.2.2), downloading media from sources like YouTube (5.2.3), and Apple's own trademarks, emoji or product look (5.2.5). Fix it by attaching proof of rights in App Review Information, or by removing or renaming what Apple flagged.

Sub-rules
5
5.2.1 to 5.2.5
Legal rejections, 2025
495,673
Second only to Performance
Proof Apple accepts
Documents
Contracts, emails, screenshots, video, licences
Text changed since 2024
No
5.2.4 was only split into (a) and (b)

01The five parts of Guideline 5.2

Make sure your app only includes content that you created or that you have a license to use. Your app may be removed if you've stepped over the line and used content without permission.
— App Store Review Guidelines, 5.2 Intellectual Property
Guideline 5.2 sub-rules and typical indie triggers
RuleWhat it coversTypical trigger
5.2.1 GenerallyThird-party trademarks, copyrighted works and patented ideas; who submits the appA brand, character or device maker named in the app or metadata; a seller name that doesn't match the brand
5.2.2 Third-Party Sites/ServicesUsing or displaying content from a service whose terms don't permit itReposting to Instagram, scraping an API, wrapping someone else's content
5.2.3 Audio/Video DownloadingSaving, converting or downloading media from third-party sourcesYouTube or SoundCloud downloaders; unlicensed streams
5.2.4 Apple EndorsementsImplying Apple supplies or endorses your app“Apple-approved”, a fake Editor's Choice badge
5.2.5 Apple ProductsApple's names, product look, emoji, Music previews, Activity ringsAn iPhone drawn in the icon; “iMessage” used the wrong way; Apple emoji in stickers

Section 5 is Legal, and it's the second most-cited section in Apple's 2025 Transparency Report: 495,673 rejections, behind only Performance. Two neighbouring rules overlap with 5.2 — Guideline 4.1 for copying another app's name, icon or design, and Guideline 2.3.7 for trademarked terms in keywords.

The finding, in one line
According to ASOitis, Guideline 5.2.1 covers who submits an app, not only what's inside it: Apple has rejected an app because the seller name didn't match the brand in the app, and told the developer to resubmit through the client's own account — so an app built for a client should go live under the client's developer account from day one.

025.2.1: someone else's brand or content

5.2.1 says “don't use protected third-party material such as trademarks, copyrighted works, or patented ideas in your app without permission.” Apps that control hardware or connect to a named product get this often. An April 2024 rejection, posted on Apple's forums:

Your app includes content or features from GarFi, or is marketed to control external hardware from GarFi, without the necessary authorization. … To resolve this issue, please attach documentary evidence in the App Review Information section in App Store Connect. Once we have reviewed your documentation and confirmed its validity, we will proceed with the review of your app. Alternatively, please remove the third-party content from your app and its metadata.
— App Review rejection under 5.2.1, posted on Apple Developer Forums

That's the choice for every 5.2 rejection: prove you have the rights, or take the material out. Apple's App Review help lists what counts as proof for 4.1, 5.2.1 and 5.2.3 cases — “trademark or rights documentation, such as a signed contract, electronic communication (emails, messaging-service screenshots), video recordings, or licensing documents” — and asks you to attach it before you submit.

035.2.1: whose account the app is published under

The last sentence of 5.2.1 catches agencies and freelancers: “Apps should be submitted by the person or legal entity that owns or has licensed the intellectual property and other relevant rights.” In October 2024 a developer got this:

The seller and company names associated with your app do not reflect the name "Paycall" in the app or its metadata, as required by Guideline 5.2.1 of the App Review Guidelines. To resolve this issue, your app must be published under a seller name and company name that reflects the Paycall name. If you have developed this app on behalf of a client, you may resubmit the app through their account, if they have one.
— App Review rejection under 5.2.1, posted on Apple Developer Forums

If you're paying someone to build your app, it should be submitted from your own Apple Developer account, under your company name. That's how our App Studio ships client apps: built for you, published under your account.

045.2.2 and 5.2.3: other services and media

5.2.2 asks that if your app uses or displays content from a third-party service, you “ensure that you are specifically permitted to do so under the service's terms of use. Authorization must be provided upon request.” A repost tool learned this in August 2020: “your app allows users to upload photos or videos to third-party services that do not support this functionality… please remove any features or functionality that allow users to alter third-party social media accounts.”

5.2.3 is blunter: no saving, converting or downloading media “from third-party sources (e.g. Apple Music, YouTube, SoundCloud, Vimeo, etc.) without explicit authorization from those sources.” It also flags streaming that merely looks unlicensed. An April 2022 rejection for “potentially unauthorized access to third-party audio or video streaming” hit an app that streamed only its creator's own voice recordings. The fix was documentary evidence: a signed statement from the rights holder.

055.2.5: Apple's own names, devices and emoji

Two 5.2.5 rejections and how they were fixed
What Apple flaggedFix
“Apple trademark, iPhone, imagery - or likeness - in the app icon” (Jan 2022)Redraw the icon without a device that looks like an iPhone
“iMessage in the app name or subtitle in an inappropriate manner” (Mar 2020)The developer changed the subtitle from “emojis for iMessage” to “stickers for iMessage” and was approved

Apple's App Store marketing guidelines set the naming rule: use Apple product names “in a referential phrase to indicate that your app is compatible with these products. For example, say app name for iPhone or app name for iPad… Don't say iPhone app name.” They also say “Apple Vision Pro” can't be in your app name at all, only in the description.

  • Apple emoji. 5.2.5: apps and extensions, “including third-party keyboards and Sticker packs, may not include Apple emoji.”
  • Device images. Apple's marketing guidelines say to use Apple product images “as is” — no added reflections, cropping, tilting or icons made from a product image.
  • Look-alikes. No app that's “confusingly similar” to an Apple product, interface or app such as the App Store or Messages.
  • Apple Music previews can't be used as background music for their entertainment value.

06Fixing a 5.2 rejection and replying

  1. Identify the exact material

    The message names the brand, service or Apple mark. Search your app, metadata, screenshots, icon and keyword field for every appearance of it.

  2. Decide: prove or remove

    If you have rights, gather the contract, licence or written permission. If you don't, remove the material everywhere — Apple asks for both “your app and its metadata”.

  3. Attach evidence in App Review Information

    Apple reviews documentation before continuing; legal reviews can take longer, so send it complete the first time.

  4. Fix the account if the name is wrong

    If the seller name doesn't match the brand, resubmit from the brand owner's account or ask Developer Support to update the company name.

  5. Upload a new build if the app changed

    Icon and in-app content need a new build; name, subtitle and keyword changes are metadata on the rejected version.

Reply in App Store Connect — Guideline 5.2text
Hello App Review team,

Thank you for the feedback on Guideline 5.2.[1/2/3/5].

[If you have the rights]
We are authorized to use [brand/content] in the app. A [signed licence /
written permission from [owner], dated [date]] is attached in App Review
Information.

[If you removed it]
We removed [brand/content] from the app (build [number]), the app name,
subtitle, keywords, description and screenshots.

Thank you,
[Name]

07If someone else uses your brand

5.2 works in your favour too. Apple's App Store dispute forms include an App Store Content Dispute, for apps that violate your intellectual property, and an App Name Dispute, if an app is “preventing you from using your trademark as an app name.” Apple says it contacts the other developer and asks them to work with you directly. It doesn't investigate claims about branded terms used as Search Ads keywords.

Frequently asked questions

What does Guideline 5.2.1 mean?

It bans using third-party trademarks, copyrighted works or patented ideas without permission, and says apps should be submitted by the person or company that owns or licensed the rights. Apple asks for documentary evidence of rights, or removal of the material from the app and metadata.

What documentation does Apple accept as proof of rights?

Apple's App Review help lists trademark or rights documentation such as a signed contract, electronic communication like emails or messaging screenshots, video recordings, or licensing documents. Attach it in the App Review Information section in App Store Connect.

Can I use “iPhone” in my app name?

Only as a referential phrase, like “App Name for iPhone”. Apple's marketing guidelines say not to put the product name first, as in “iPhone App Name”, and that “Apple Vision Pro” can't appear in the app name at all.

Can my app download videos from YouTube?

Not without explicit authorization from the source. Guideline 5.2.3 bans saving, converting or downloading media from third-party sources such as YouTube, SoundCloud, Vimeo or Apple Music without permission.

Can a developer publish my app under their own account?

Apple expects apps to be submitted by whoever owns the rights. It has rejected apps whose seller name didn't match the brand and told the developer to resubmit through the client's account, so publish under your own Apple Developer account.

Where to go next

Sources

  1. App Store Review Guidelines — 5.2 Intellectual Property — Apple Developer
  2. Provide information for a complete review — App Review Help
  3. App Store marketing guidelines — Apple Developer
  4. Intellectual property dispute forms — App Store — Apple Legal
  5. App Store Transparency Report 2025 — Apple
  6. Forum: 5.2.1 rejection for third-party hardware branding — Apple Developer Forums
  7. Forum: 5.2.1 rejection for seller name mismatch — Apple Developer Forums
  8. Forum: 5.2.5 rejection for iMessage in the subtitle — Apple Developer Forums

Published Oct 9, 2026 · last checked Oct 9, 2026. Found something out of date? Tell us and we'll fix it within a day. Machine-readable version: /app-review/guideline-5-2-intellectual-property.md